St James · Cólon
Sistemas/Cólon

St James University Hospital classification of perianal fistula

vigente

Grades perianal fistulas on MRI by anatomy and complications.

Índice de referência, não é suporte à decisão clínica. O RadCommons apresenta conteúdo de referência reescrito a partir de critérios publicados e com link para a fonte primária. Confira sempre a publicação primária vigente. Não é um dispositivo médico nem substitui o julgamento clínico. O radiologista responsável pelo laudo permanece o autor e o responsável.
Escala de categorias
12345

As figuras e tabelas estão na fonte primária. Abrir a fonte. O RadCommons reescreve e cita, não reproduz figuras protegidas por direitos autorais.

Procedência e vigência

Órgão emissor
Radiology consensus
Versão
2000
Ano
2000
Família
léxico
Tipo de lógica
flat
Modalidade
MRI
Fonte primária
MR imaging classification of perianal fistulas (St James University Hospital)
Última verificação
2026-06-26
Última checagem
2026-06-26

Lógica de decisão

Forma estruturada (flat). Uma futura calculadora a lê; as categorias abaixo são a superfície legível.

Mostrar a lógica estruturada (JSON)
{
  "categories": [
    "1",
    "2",
    "3",
    "4",
    "5"
  ]
}

Categorias num relance

Cat.SignificadoCondutaRiscoFonte
1
Grade 1
Simple linear intersphincteric fistula (single tract penetrating the internal sphincter to run between internal and external sphincters and exit the perineum, with no secondary extension or abscess).
Counts as a 'simple'/low fistula: generally amenable to laying-open (fistulotomy/fistulectomy) with low risk of incontinence, since no external-sphincter muscle is divided.Favorable: grades 1-2 were associated with a satisfactory outcome, versus grades 3-5 (unsatisfactory, e.g. need for further surgery; P<0.001) in the cited series.
Criteria/management/outcome: PMC4394844 ('MRI of Perianal Fistulas'), section 'Classification of Perianal Fistulae' (Grade 1 = 'a simple intersphincteric fistula' penetrating between the sphincters) and the outcome statement 'grades 1 and 2 were associated with satisfactory outcome whereas grades 3-5 were associated with unsatisfactory outcome ... (P<0.001)'; simple/low-fistula fistulotomy principle from the same article.
2
Grade 2
Intersphincteric fistula with an intersphincteric secondary tract or abscess.
Still intersphincteric (no trans-sphincteric muscle involvement) but with a secondary tract/abscess that must be drained/laid open in addition to treating the primary tract; broadly grouped with the lower-risk fistulas for sphincter-sparing intent.Favorable: grades 1-2 were associated with a satisfactory outcome (vs unsatisfactory for grades 3-5; P<0.001) in the cited series.
Criteria: PMC4394844, 'Classification of Perianal Fistulae', Grade 2 = 'an intersphincteric fistula with a secondary tract or abscess'. Outcome/risk: same article, 'grades 1 and 2 were associated with satisfactory outcome whereas grades 3-5 ... unsatisfactory ... (P<0.001)'.
3
Grade 3
Simple (uncomplicated) transsphincteric fistula (tract crosses both the internal and external sphincters into the ischioanal fossa without secondary extension or abscess).
Trans-sphincteric tracts cross the external sphincter, so simple laying-open risks incontinence (>50% with the lay-open technique for complex disease); sphincter-preserving options (e.g. seton, advancement flap) are favored, the more so with the higher grades.Less favorable: grades 3-5 were associated with an unsatisfactory outcome (e.g. need for further surgery), in contrast to satisfactory outcomes for grades 1-2 (P<0.001) in the cited series.
Criteria: PMC4394844, 'Classification of Perianal Fistulae', Grade 3 = 'simple transphincteric fistulae'. Management/outcome: same article — incontinence '>50%' with laying-open of complex fistulas, and 'grades 3-5 were associated with unsatisfactory outcome ... (P<0.001)'.
4
Grade 4
Transsphincteric fistula with an associated secondary tract or abscess (a more complicated transsphincteric process), typically extending into the ischioanal/ischiorectal fossa.
Complex fistula: laying-open is avoided (incontinence in >50% of cases); managed with sphincter-preserving and/or staged techniques (non-cutting seton, mucosal advancement flap) plus drainage of the secondary tract/abscess.Unfavorable: grade 4 falls in the grades 3-5 band associated with an unsatisfactory outcome / need for further surgery (vs satisfactory for grades 1-2; P<0.001) in the cited series.
Criteria: PMC4394844, Grade 4 = 'a more complicated transphincteric process with a secondary tract or abscess'; ischioanal/ischiorectal-fossa site corroborated by WebSearch summaries of St James / Morris 2000 on pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Management/outcome: same article — complex fistulas need sphincter-preserving/staged surgery (lay-open incontinence '>50%') and 'grades 3-5 ... unsatisfactory outcome ... (P<0.001)'.
5
Grade 5
Supralevator and/or translevator disease (a complicated fistula/abscess with a supralevator or translevator component, extending above the level of the levator ani).
Most complex group: requires sphincter-preserving and often staged/specialist surgery (seton, advancement flap, treatment of the supra/translevator component) with imaging-guided planning; simple laying-open is contraindicated given the high incontinence risk.Most unfavorable: grade 5 lies in the grades 3-5 band associated with an unsatisfactory outcome / need for further surgery (vs satisfactory for grades 1-2; P<0.001) in the cited series.
Criteria: PMC4394844, Grade 5 = 'a complicated abscess with a supra or translevator component'. Management/outcome: same article — complex/high disease needs sphincter-preserving/staged surgery (lay-open incontinence '>50%') and 'grades 3-5 were associated with unsatisfactory outcome ... (P<0.001)'.

Histórico de versões

Nenhum evento de versão registrado.

Quickstart da APIGET /api/v1/systems/stjames-fistulaaberto
curl -s "https://radcommons.laudos.ai/api/v1/systems/stjames-fistula"
Ver documentação completa