Young-Burgess · Musculoesquelético
Sistemas/Musculoesquelético

Young-Burgess Young and Burgess classification of pelvic ring injuries

vigente

Classifies pelvic ring injuries by mechanism.

Índice de referência, não é suporte à decisão clínica. O RadCommons apresenta conteúdo de referência reescrito a partir de critérios publicados e com link para a fonte primária. Confira sempre a publicação primária vigente. Não é um dispositivo médico nem substitui o julgamento clínico. O radiologista responsável pelo laudo permanece o autor e o responsável.
Escala de categorias
LCAPCVSCM

As figuras e tabelas estão na fonte primária. Abrir a fonte. O RadCommons reescreve e cita, não reproduz figuras protegidas por direitos autorais.

Procedência e vigência

Órgão emissor
Radiology consensus
Versão
1990
Ano
1990
Família
léxico
Tipo de lógica
flat
Modalidade
CT, XR
Fonte primária
Pelvic ring disruptions: mechanism of injury classification (Young and Burgess)
Última verificação
2026-06-26
Última checagem
2026-06-26

Lógica de decisão

Forma estruturada (flat). Uma futura calculadora a lê; as categorias abaixo são a superfície legível.

Mostrar a lógica estruturada (JSON)
{
  "categories": [
    "LC",
    "APC",
    "VS",
    "CM"
  ]
}

Categorias num relance

Cat.SignificadoCondutaRiscoFonte
LC
Lateral compression
Lateral compression: a side-directed force that internally rotates the hemipelvis, typically producing a transverse/oblique anterior ring fracture with an ipsilateral posterior (sacral) injury; the most common mechanism and generally the more stable pattern (subtypes LC1 anterior sacral compression, LC2 crescent fracture, LC3 contralateral AP injury).
LC1 is typically stable and managed non-operatively; LC2 and LC3 are unstable and generally require fixation. Use caution with pelvic binders, which can over-compress an internally rotated (LC) pelvis and injure other structures.Generally the more stable, lower-hemorrhage pattern; closed head injury (not pelvic bleeding) is the most common cause of death in LC injuries. Stable patterns carry ~7.9% mortality versus ~11.5% for unstable patterns.
Evaluation > Classification (Young and Burgess classification); Treatment/Prognosis (LC1 stable/non-operative, LC2-3 unstable; binder over-compression caution; head injury leading cause of LC mortality; ~7.9% vs ~11.5% mortality stable vs unstable)
APC
Anteroposterior compression
Anteroposterior compression: a front-to-back force that externally rotates the hemipelvis, opening the symphysis (open-book pattern) with progressive disruption of the sacrospinous, sacrotuberous, and sacroiliac ligaments; associated with hemorrhage (APC1 minor symphysis widening, APC2 >2.5 cm opening with anterior SI ligament disruption, APC3 complete anterior and posterior SI disruption).
APC1 is minimally unstable; APC2 and APC3 are progressively unstable and require fixation. A pelvic binder can help reduce open-book volume acutely; angioembolization is considered for ongoing arterial bleeding.Higher hemorrhage risk; the superior gluteal artery is most frequently injured in APC patterns. Unstable patterns carry higher mortality (~11.5%) than stable ones (~7.9%).
Evaluation > Classification (Young and Burgess classification); Treatment/Prognosis (APC1 minimally unstable, APC2-3 require fixation; superior gluteal artery most affected; ~11.5% mortality unstable vs ~7.9% stable)
VS
Vertical shear
Vertical shear: an axially directed force producing vertical displacement of the hemipelvis with complete ligamentous disruption, representing complete (rotational and vertical) instability.
Completely unstable; requires operative stabilization, with a pelvic binder considered in the hemodynamically unstable patient for temporary stabilization.Complete instability with high associated hemorrhage and injury burden; falls in the unstable group with the higher (~11.5%) mortality.
Evaluation > Classification (Young and Burgess classification); Treatment/Prognosis (vertical displacement = complete instability, operative management, binder if hemodynamically unstable; unstable-group mortality ~11.5%)
CM
Combined mechanism
Combined mechanism: any combination of the lateral compression, anteroposterior compression, and vertical shear force patterns.
No distinct treatment pathway; managed according to its component patterns (stability, fixation, and resuscitation needs of the dominant injuries).Risk reflects the component patterns; unstable combinations align with the higher (~11.5%) mortality of unstable pelvic ring injuries.
Evaluation > Classification (Young and Burgess classification); Treatment/Prognosis (combined patterns managed per component; unstable-injury mortality ~11.5%)

Histórico de versões

Nenhum evento de versão registrado.

Quickstart da APIGET /api/v1/systems/young-burgessaberto
curl -s "https://radcommons.laudos.ai/api/v1/systems/young-burgess"
Ver documentação completa