Bilsky ESCC · Coluna
Sistemas/Coluna

Bilsky ESCC Epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC / Bilsky) scale

vigente

Per-level six-category MRI morphology for neoplastic epidural disease, assigned on axial T2 at the site of greatest cord compromise. ESCC supplies the neurologic imaging axis of NOMS; it neither measures mechanical instability nor independently chooses surgery or radiation.

Índice de referência, não é suporte à decisão clínica. O RadCommons apresenta conteúdo de referência reescrito a partir de critérios publicados e com link para a fonte primária. Confira sempre a publicação primária vigente. Não é um dispositivo médico nem substitui o julgamento clínico. O radiologista responsável pelo laudo permanece o autor e o responsável.
Escala de categorias
01a1b1c23

As figuras e tabelas estão na fonte primária. Abrir a fonte. O RadCommons reescreve e cita, não reproduz figuras protegidas por direitos autorais.

Procedência e vigência

Órgão emissor
Spine Oncology Study Group
Versão
2010 scale; current NOMS, NICE 2023 and ASTRO 2024 context
Ano
2010
Família
léxico
Tipo de lógica
flat
Modalidade
MRI
Fonte primária
Reliability analysis of the epidural spinal cord compression scale · doi:10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09459
Última verificação
2026-07-24
Última checagem
2026-08-12

Lógica de decisão

Forma estruturada (flat). Uma futura calculadora a lê; as categorias abaixo são a superfície legível.

Assign ESCC per involved cord level on axial T2, preserve uncertainty and emergency red flags, and integrate rather than conflate the neurologic, oncologic, mechanical and systemic NOMS axes.

Mostrar a lógica estruturada (JSON)
{
  "categories": [
    {
      "outcome_code": "0",
      "label": "bone_only",
      "epidural_tumor": "absent",
      "thecal_sac_deformation": "absent",
      "cord_abutment": "absent",
      "cord_compression": "absent",
      "CSF_around_cord": "preserved"
    },
    {
      "outcome_code": "1a",
      "label": "epidural_impingement",
      "epidural_tumor": "present",
      "thecal_sac_deformation": "absent",
      "cord_abutment": "absent",
      "cord_compression": "absent",
      "CSF_around_cord": "preserved"
    },
    {
      "outcome_code": "1b",
      "label": "thecal_sac_deformation_without_cord_abutment",
      "epidural_tumor": "present",
      "thecal_sac_deformation": "present",
      "cord_abutment": "absent",
      "cord_compression": "absent",
      "CSF_around_cord": "preserved"
    },
    {
      "outcome_code": "1c",
      "label": "cord_abutment_without_compression",
      "epidural_tumor": "present",
      "thecal_sac_deformation": "present",
      "cord_abutment": "present",
      "cord_compression": "absent",
      "CSF_around_cord": "no_interposed_CSF_at_contact_but_no_cord_compression"
    },
    {
      "outcome_code": "2",
      "label": "cord_compression_with_residual_CSF",
      "epidural_tumor": "present",
      "thecal_sac_deformation": "present",
      "cord_abutment": "present",
      "cord_compression": "present",
      "CSF_around_cord": "visible"
    },
    {
      "outcome_code": "3",
      "label": "cord_compression_without_residual_CSF",
      "epidural_tumor": "present",
      "thecal_sac_deformation": "present",
      "cord_abutment": "present",
      "cord_compression": "present",
      "CSF_around_cord": "not_visible"
    }
  ],
  "applicability": {
    "intended_use": "Describe the maximal degree of neoplastic epidural spinal cord compromise at each involved level, principally in metastatic spine disease.",
    "reference_image": "Axial T2-weighted MRI at the site of most severe compression; use the full multiplanar examination to localize the level, confirm tumor extent and avoid a partial-volume classification.",
    "required_anatomy": "A spinal cord level where epidural tumor, thecal sac, spinal cord and surrounding CSF can be assessed.",
    "outside_scope": [
      "mechanical_instability_or_pathologic_fracture_scoring_use_SINS_separately",
      "non_neoplastic_epidural_abscess_hematoma_disc_or_postoperative_material",
      "intramedullary_or_intradural_extramedullary_tumor_without_neoplastic_epidural_extension",
      "treatment_selection_without_tumor_radiosensitivity_prior_radiation_stability_neurology_and_systemic_fitness"
    ]
  },
  "acquisition_and_quality_gate": {
    "suspected_MSCC_current_MRI": "When metastatic spinal cord compression is clinically suspected with neurologic signs or symptoms, current NICE guidance calls for MRI as soon as possible and always within 24 hours; an elective classification workflow must not delay that pathway.",
    "whole_spine_protocol_context": "Current NICE guidance uses sagittal T1 and/or STIR through the whole spine, sagittal T2 to show cord or cauda-equina compression, and supplementary axial imaging through every significant abnormality.",
    "grade_plane": "Assign the ESCC grade on axial T2 at maximal compression, cross-checked against sagittal and adjacent axial images.",
    "technical_failure": "Motion, incomplete coverage, severe artifact or absent axial T2 at the maximal level makes the grade indeterminate; do not infer it from a single sagittal image."
  },
  "grading_algorithm": [
    {
      "step": 1,
      "question": "Is tumor confined to bone without epidural extension?",
      "if_yes": "0",
      "if_no": "continue"
    },
    {
      "step": 2,
      "question": "Is there epidural impingement without thecal-sac deformation?",
      "if_yes": "1a",
      "if_no": "continue"
    },
    {
      "step": 3,
      "question": "Is the thecal sac deformed but the cord not abutted?",
      "if_yes": "1b",
      "if_no": "continue"
    },
    {
      "step": 4,
      "question": "Does tumor abut the cord without deforming/compressing it?",
      "if_yes": "1c",
      "if_no": "continue"
    },
    {
      "step": 5,
      "question": "Is the cord compressed but CSF remains visible around it?",
      "if_yes": "2",
      "if_no": "continue"
    },
    {
      "step": 6,
      "question": "Is the cord compressed with no visible surrounding CSF?",
      "if_yes": "3",
      "if_no": "ungradable_or_wrong_scope"
    }
  ],
  "boundary_rules": {
    "grade_0_1a": "The decisive boundary is epidural extension: bone-only disease is 0; epidural impingement that has not deformed the thecal sac is 1a.",
    "grade_1a_1b": "Thecal-sac deformation moves 1a to 1b even before cord contact.",
    "grade_1b_1c": "Actual cord abutment moves 1b to 1c; proximity without demonstrable contact is not 1c.",
    "grade_1c_2": "Cord contact alone is 1c; deformation/compression of the cord is required for 2.",
    "grade_2_3": "Residual visible CSF around a compressed cord is 2; complete loss of visible CSF at the maximal compression site is 3.",
    "adjacent_uncertainty": "If a boundary feature cannot be resolved, return the adjacent-grade interval and the missing discriminator rather than a false exact grade."
  },
  "per_level_and_study_synthesis": {
    "level_rule": "Grade every clinically relevant involved cord level separately and identify the axial image/series used.",
    "headline_rule": "The study headline may name the highest grade, but it must retain all other levels rather than collapsing multilevel disease into one patient-level code.",
    "required_companions": [
      "vertebral_and_posterior_element_tumor_extent",
      "epidural_direction_and_craniocaudal_length",
      "cord_signal_abnormality",
      "pathologic_fracture_or_retropulsion",
      "alignment",
      "paraspinal_extension"
    ],
    "progression_rule": "On follow-up, preserve the prior level-specific grade, treatment interval and direction of change; do not overwrite trajectory with only the new maximum."
  },
  "cauda_equina_and_conus_boundary": {
    "original_scale": "The original definitions refer to spinal cord compression.",
    "current_emergency_scope": "Modern MSCC pathways also address cauda-equina compression, so urgent clinical handling still applies below the conus.",
    "agent_rule": "If the morphology is adapted to a cauda-equina level, label it explicitly as an adaptation and describe root/CSF effacement directly; do not imply identical original validation."
  },
  "NOMS_integration": {
    "neurologic": "Combine ESCC morphology with myelopathy, radiculopathy and the neurologic examination; ESCC is the radiographic component, not the complete neurologic assessment.",
    "oncologic": "Tumor histology, radiosensitivity, molecular context and prior radiation determine whether conventional radiation, stereotactic radiation or decompression is feasible.",
    "mechanical": "Score or describe stability separately, commonly with SINS. A low ESCC grade can coexist with an unstable painful fracture, and a high ESCC grade does not itself encode instability.",
    "systemic": "Performance status, systemic disease burden, comorbidity, expected tolerance, available options and goals of care constrain treatment.",
    "low_grade_context": "In NOMS, grades 0, 1a and 1b are low-grade epidural disease and are often considered for radiation-first treatment when there is no mechanical instability, but this is conditional on oncologic and systemic factors.",
    "grade_1c_context": "The original NOMS publication identifies uncertainty regarding the role and durability of radiosurgery for grade 1c; do not silently treat 1c as either the low-grade or high-grade algorithm.",
    "high_grade_context": "Grades 2 and 3 are high-grade ESCC. Except for highly radiosensitive tumors, NOMS commonly considers decompression before radiation; current ASTRO guidance conditionally favors surgery plus postoperative radiation over radiation alone in appropriate patients with cord or cauda-equina compression.",
    "non_autonomous_rule": "No ESCC category autonomously orders surgery, radiation, steroid treatment, transfer or surveillance."
  },
  "urgency_and_clinical_override": {
    "red_flags": [
      "new_or_progressive_weakness",
      "gait_decline_or_loss_of_ambulation",
      "sensory_level",
      "new_bowel_or_bladder_dysfunction",
      "myelopathy",
      "rapidly_progressive_radicular_deficit"
    ],
    "action_rule": "Known or suspected cancer plus cord/cauda-equina compression symptoms is an oncologic emergency requiring immediate local MSCC escalation; do not wait for an exact ESCC grade.",
    "clinical_fields_to_capture": [
      "neurologic_baseline",
      "time_of_onset_and_rate_of_decline",
      "ambulation",
      "bowel_and_bladder_status",
      "pain_and_mechanical_features",
      "corticosteroid_status",
      "prior_spine_treatment"
    ]
  },
  "evidence_and_risk_interpretation": {
    "reliability": "The 2010 study validated reproducible six-category MRI morphology among readers; reliability does not make the scale a standalone outcome model.",
    "ordinal_warning": "Increasing grade represents increasing epidural compromise, but it is not a calibrated individual probability of paralysis, recovery or survival.",
    "treatment_evidence_warning": "NOMS, NICE and ASTRO provide decision context beyond the scale. Their recommendations must be applied to the actual clinical population, tumor and local pathway rather than copied as grade-only commands."
  },
  "agent_output_contract": [
    "exact_level_and_maximal_axial_T2_image",
    "exact_ESCC_grade_or_adjacent_grade_uncertainty",
    "epidural_extent_direction_and_length",
    "cord_compression_and_cord_signal_separately",
    "fracture_alignment_and_mechanical_stability_context_separately",
    "neurologic_red_flags_and_time_course_when_available",
    "tumor_histology_radiosensitivity_prior_radiation_and_systemic_context_when_available",
    "explicit_urgent_escalation_if_MSCC_is_suspected",
    "no_grade_only_treatment_or_prognostic_probability"
  ],
  "missing_input_behavior": [
    "If axial T2 at maximal compression is unavailable or nondiagnostic, return ungradable and request/identify the missing sequence rather than assigning from sagittal images alone.",
    "If cord contact versus compression cannot be resolved, return 1c-versus-2 and name cord deformation plus residual CSF as the unresolved features.",
    "If compression is present but residual CSF cannot be assessed, return 2-versus-3 rather than guessing.",
    "If neurologic status is absent, report imaging morphology only and withhold urgency based on symptoms, functional prognosis and treatment selection.",
    "If pathology, prior radiation, stability or systemic fitness is absent, do not produce a NOMS treatment recommendation."
  ],
  "supporting_sources": [
    {
      "role": "primary_scale",
      "citation": "Bilsky et al. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13:324-328",
      "doi": "10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09459",
      "pmid": "20809724"
    },
    {
      "role": "multidisciplinary_framework",
      "citation": "Laufer et al. Oncologist. 2013;18:744-751",
      "doi": "10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0293",
      "pmcid": "PMC4063402"
    },
    {
      "role": "current_emergency_pathway",
      "citation": "NICE NG234. 2023",
      "url": "https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng234/chapter/recommendations"
    },
    {
      "role": "current_radiation_guideline",
      "citation": "Alcorn et al. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024",
      "doi": "10.1016/j.prro.2024.04.018",
      "pmid": "38788923"
    }
  ],
  "source_locator": "Bilsky et al. 2010, DOI 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09459, abstract and six-point definitions for axial T2 grading and reliability; Laufer et al. 2013, PMC4063402, Neurologic Assessment and Oncologic Assessment sections and Figure 1 for low/high-grade NOMS integration and the grade 1c uncertainty; NICE NG234 recommendations 1.5.2-1.5.5 for urgent MRI and sequences; ASTRO 2024 guideline abstract for cord/cauda-equina compression treatment context."
}

Categorias num relance

Cat.SignificadoCondutaRiscoFonte
0
Grade 0, bone-only disease
At the named spinal cord level on axial T2 MRI, neoplastic involvement is confined to bone with no tumor extending into the epidural space or spinal canal. Confirm the apparent absence of epidural disease across multiplanar images and distinguish fracture fragments or non-tumor material.
Report grade 0 per involved level and separately assess pain, fracture, alignment and SINS/mechanical stability. Within NOMS, low-grade epidural morphology may support radiation-first oncologic care when treatment is needed and stability/systemic factors permit, but grade 0 alone neither orders treatment nor excludes surgical referral for instability.There is no neoplastic epidural cord compromise at that level by the scale, but bone-only disease can still fracture, collapse, deform or cause mechanical pain. ESCC 0 is not a low overall patient-risk label and does not predict neurologic trajectory, survival or treatment response.
Bilsky et al. 2010, DOI 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09459, six-point definition of grade 0; Laufer et al. 2013, PMC4063402, Neurologic Assessment and Mechanical Assessment for low-grade ESCC versus SINS/NOMS context.
1a
Grade 1a, epidural impingement, no thecal sac deformation
Epidural neoplastic impingement is present on axial T2 MRI, but the thecal sac contour is not deformed. Identify the level, direction and craniocaudal extent of epidural tumor rather than recording only the category.
Treat 1a as low-grade epidural disease within the neurologic NOMS axis and integrate tumor radiosensitivity, prior radiation, SINS stability, neurologic status and systemic fitness. It commonly remains in a radiation-first pathway when otherwise appropriate, but this tendency is conditional and not a grade-only command.The epidural compartment is involved, although the sac is not yet deformed. Progression risk depends on tumor biology, treatment and time; 1a does not provide a calibrated probability of later compression and must not obscure instability or rapidly evolving neurologic symptoms.
Bilsky et al. 2010, DOI 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09459, grade 1a definition; Laufer et al. 2013, PMC4063402, ESCC Figure 1 and NOMS low-grade treatment context.
1b
Grade 1b, thecal sac deformation, no cord abutment
Epidural tumor deforms the thecal sac on axial T2 MRI without abutting the spinal cord. Demonstrable sac deformation distinguishes 1b from 1a; demonstrable cord contact would move the morphology to 1c.
Report 1b per level with the epidural direction/length and keep cord signal, fracture and stability separate. NOMS generally treats 0-1b as low-grade ESCC for oncologic planning, but management still requires histology/radiosensitivity, prior treatment, examination, SINS and systemic feasibility.Thecal-sac deformation represents greater epidural compromise than 1a but there is no cord contact or compression by definition. The category remains an ordinal morphology, not an individualized paralysis, recovery or survival estimate.
Bilsky et al. 2010, DOI 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09459, grade 1b definition; Laufer et al. 2013, PMC4063402, Neurologic Assessment for low-grade ESCC and conditional radiation context.
1c
Grade 1c, thecal sac deformation with cord abutment, no compression
Epidural tumor deforms the thecal sac and directly abuts the spinal cord, but the cord itself is not compressed. If contact versus deformation cannot be resolved, preserve 1b-versus-1c uncertainty; if the cord is deformed/compressed, evaluate grade 2 or 3.
Escalate 1c for multidisciplinary NOMS review rather than silently grouping it with either 0-1b or 2-3. The original NOMS publication describes uncertainty about the role and durability of radiosurgery at this boundary; symptoms, radiosensitivity, prior radiation, stability and systemic status determine the actual plan.Cord contact without compression is an important boundary state, but it is not a validated probability of neurologic deterioration. Rapid clinical decline or myelopathy overrides the stored category and requires emergency assessment even when the morphology remains 1c.
Bilsky et al. 2010, DOI 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09459, grade 1c definition; Laufer et al. 2013, PMC4063402, Neurologic Assessment noting unresolved grade 1c radiosurgery role.
2
Grade 2, cord compression with CSF visible around the cord
The spinal cord is compressed/deformed by epidural neoplastic disease, while cerebrospinal fluid remains visibly interposed around at least part of the cord on the maximal axial T2 image. If residual CSF cannot be judged, retain grade 2-versus-3 uncertainty.
Grade 2 is high-grade ESCC and warrants urgent multidisciplinary assessment. NOMS commonly considers decompression before radiation for radioresistant tumors, while highly radiosensitive histologies and other patient factors may support a different pathway; current ASTRO guidance conditionally favors surgery plus postoperative radiation over radiation alone in appropriate cord/cauda-equina compression patients.True cord compression is present. Neurologic risk depends on examination, cord signal, speed of onset, level, tumor and treatment timing; the presence of residual CSF does not make symptomatic compression nonurgent or supply an individual probability of paralysis.
Bilsky et al. 2010, DOI 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09459, grade 2 definition; Laufer et al. 2013, PMC4063402, high-grade ESCC NOMS pathway; NICE NG234 recommendations 1.5.2-1.5.5 for urgent MRI; ASTRO 2024 DOI 10.1016/j.prro.2024.04.018, cord/cauda-equina compression recommendation context.
3
Grade 3, cord compression with no CSF visible
The spinal cord is compressed by epidural neoplastic disease and no surrounding cerebrospinal-fluid signal remains visible at the site of maximal compression on axial T2 MRI. Verify technical quality and exact level before assigning the category.
Grade 3 is high-grade ESCC and requires urgent MSCC-pathway escalation, with immediate attention to neurologic deficits and ambulation. Surgical, radiation and corticosteroid decisions remain multidisciplinary and patient-specific; tumor radiosensitivity, prior radiation, SINS stability, systemic fitness and goals of care must accompany the grade.This is the greatest cord-compromise morphology in the scale, but it is not synonymous with irreversible paralysis or futility. Outcome depends on baseline and evolving neurology, duration, cord injury, tumor and timely treatment, so no universal recovery or mortality percentage should be attached.
Bilsky et al. 2010, DOI 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09459, grade 3 definition; Laufer et al. 2013, PMC4063402, high-grade ESCC/NOMS; NICE NG234 MSCC emergency pathway; ASTRO 2024 DOI 10.1016/j.prro.2024.04.018, multimodality treatment context.

Referências cruzadas

fronteira compartilhadaSINS. Spinal Instability Neoplastic ScoreComponents of the NOMS framework for metastatic spine disease: ESCC grades neurologic/cord compromise, SINS grades mechanical instability.

Histórico de versões

DataEventoDetalheSituação
2026-07-25revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2010-09-01publishedEpidural spinal cord compression scale reliability analysis published in J Neurosurg Spine.confirmado
Quickstart da APIGET /api/v1/systems/bilsky-esccaberto
curl -s "https://radcommons.laudos.ai/api/v1/systems/bilsky-escc"
Ver documentação completa