Cambridge · Pâncreas
Sistemas/Pâncreas

Cambridge classification of chronic pancreatitis morphology

vigente

Grades chronic-pancreatitis morphology from normal through marked using a ductal ERCP/MRCP branch and an APA CT/MRI/US adaptation; modality must be retained because cross-sectional imaging alone cannot reliably separate every intermediate grade.

Índice de referência, não é suporte à decisão clínica. O RadCommons apresenta conteúdo de referência reescrito a partir de critérios publicados e com link para a fonte primária. Confira sempre a publicação primária vigente. Não é um dispositivo médico nem substitui o julgamento clínico. O radiologista responsável pelo laudo permanece o autor e o responsável.
Escala de categorias
normalequivocalmildmoderatemarkedmild-or-moderate

As figuras e tabelas estão na fonte primária. Abrir a fonte. O RadCommons reescreve e cita, não reproduz figuras protegidas por direitos autorais.

Procedência e vigência

Órgão emissor
Cambridge consensus / American Pancreatic Association
Versão
1984; APA multimodality adaptation 2014
Ano
1984
Família
léxico
Tipo de lógica
flat
Modalidade
ERCP, MRCP, MRI, CT, US
Fonte primária
Classification of pancreatitis · doi:10.1136/gut.25.7.756
Última verificação
2026-07-24
Última checagem
2026-08-12

Lógica de decisão

Forma estruturada (flat). Uma futura calculadora a lê; as categorias abaixo são a superfície legível.

Always retain modality. Use the ductal branch when side branches and main duct are adequately shown; on CT, MRI or ultrasound alone preserve the APA II-versus-III limitation instead of inventing precision.

Mostrar a lógica estruturada (JSON)
{
  "categories": [
    {
      "outcome_code": "normal",
      "official_grade": "0",
      "label": "normal",
      "role": "canonical_Cambridge_grade"
    },
    {
      "outcome_code": "equivocal",
      "official_grade": "I",
      "label": "equivocal",
      "role": "canonical_Cambridge_grade"
    },
    {
      "outcome_code": "mild",
      "official_grade": "II",
      "label": "mild",
      "role": "canonical_Cambridge_grade"
    },
    {
      "outcome_code": "moderate",
      "official_grade": "III",
      "label": "moderate",
      "role": "canonical_Cambridge_grade"
    },
    {
      "outcome_code": "marked",
      "official_grade": "IV",
      "label": "marked_or_severe",
      "role": "canonical_Cambridge_grade"
    },
    {
      "outcome_code": "mild-or-moderate",
      "official_grade": "II_or_III_unresolved",
      "label": "mild_versus_moderate_not_separable",
      "role": "operational_uncertainty_state_not_an_extra_official_grade"
    }
  ],
  "applicability": {
    "use_for": "Morphologic characterization of suspected or established chronic pancreatitis after the imaging modality and visible ductal or parenchymal features are known.",
    "classification_unit": "one_pancreas_at_one_examination",
    "required_inputs": [
      "modality",
      "technical_adequacy",
      "abnormal_side_branch_count_when_ductography_is_used",
      "main_pancreatic_duct_status",
      "cross_sectional_feature_count",
      "marked_feature_presence"
    ],
    "outside_scope": [
      "acute_pancreatitis_severity",
      "pancreatic_neoplasm_staging",
      "etiologic_classification",
      "exocrine_or_endocrine_function_stage",
      "treatment_selection_from_morphology_alone"
    ]
  },
  "modality_and_quality_gate": {
    "original_scope": "The Cambridge morphology grades were developed around ERCP duct changes. ERCP is now generally reserved for therapeutic intent rather than used solely to diagnose chronic pancreatitis.",
    "ductal_branch": "Use ERCP or adequately visualized MRCP ductal findings for the side-branch and main-duct rules; record whether secretin was used because it may improve branch depiction.",
    "cross_sectional_branch": "Use the APA adaptation for CT, conventional MRI or transabdominal ultrasound, retaining the modality because the feature sets and sensitivity differ.",
    "inadequacy_rule": "If the main duct or side branches are not sufficiently visualized, do not treat an unobserved ductal abnormality as absent. Return the supported cross-sectional state and state the visualization limit.",
    "early_disease_guard": "Normal CT, MRI or MRCP morphology does not exclude early chronic pancreatitis when clinical suspicion remains high; early disease may require a stepwise clinical, functional or endoscopic evaluation."
  },
  "ductal_ERCP_or_MRCP_algorithm": [
    {
      "if": "no_abnormal_ductal_signs",
      "output_code": "normal",
      "official_grade": "0"
    },
    {
      "if": "one_or_two_abnormal_side_branches_and_no_higher_grade_rule",
      "output_code": "equivocal",
      "official_grade": "I"
    },
    {
      "if": "three_or_more_abnormal_side_branches_without_the_complete_moderate_or_marked_pattern",
      "output_code": "mild",
      "official_grade": "II"
    },
    {
      "if": "more_than_three_abnormal_side_branches_and_abnormal_main_pancreatic_duct_without_a_marked_feature",
      "output_code": "moderate",
      "official_grade": "III"
    },
    {
      "if": "moderate_ductal_changes_plus_at_least_one_marked_feature",
      "output_code": "marked",
      "official_grade": "IV"
    }
  ],
  "ductal_marked_features": [
    "large_cavity_greater_than_10_mm",
    "intraductal_filling_defect_or_calculus",
    "main_duct_obstruction_or_stricture",
    "severe_main_duct_irregularity_or_dilatation"
  ],
  "cross_sectional_CT_MRI_US_algorithm": {
    "base_feature_set": [
      "main_pancreatic_duct_2_to_4_mm",
      "slight_gland_enlargement",
      "heterogeneous_parenchyma",
      "small_cavity_under_10_mm",
      "irregular_ducts",
      "focal_pancreatitis",
      "increased_echogenicity_of_main_duct_wall_on_ultrasound",
      "irregular_head_or_body_contour"
    ],
    "no_feature": {
      "output_code": "normal",
      "official_grade": "0"
    },
    "exactly_one_base_feature": {
      "output_code": "equivocal",
      "official_grade": "I"
    },
    "two_or_more_base_features_without_marked_feature": {
      "output_code": "mild-or-moderate",
      "official_grade": "II_or_III_unresolved",
      "reason": "APA Table 6 assigns the feature set to mild morphology but explicitly states that CT/MRI cannot distinguish moderate from mild. Without the ductal branch, forcing II or III creates false precision."
    },
    "marked_changes_plus_one_or_more_marked_features": {
      "output_code": "marked",
      "official_grade": "IV"
    },
    "counting_rule": "Count each demonstrated feature once, preserve its location and modality, and do not convert one complex observation into multiple independent features solely to cross a threshold."
  },
  "cross_sectional_marked_features": [
    "large_cavity_greater_than_10_mm",
    "substantial_or_gross_gland_enlargement",
    "intraductal_filling_defect_or_calculus",
    "duct_obstruction_or_stricture",
    "gross_duct_irregularity"
  ],
  "main_duct_and_feature_normalization": {
    "two_to_four_mm_rule": "The APA cross-sectional table uses a 2-4 mm main pancreatic duct as one base feature; record the measured segment and do not apply the number without anatomy, age and modality context.",
    "abnormal_main_duct_for_grade_III": "Document which ductal abnormality is present, such as dilatation, irregularity or stricture; a bare word such as abnormal is insufficient for an agent-facing result.",
    "cavity_rule": "Separate side-branch ectasia or small cavities under 10 mm from a large cavity over 10 mm, and do not assume every pancreatic cyst is a chronic-pancreatitis cavity.",
    "calcification_rule": "Intraductal calculus or filling defect is a marked feature in the adaptation, but its location and alternative causes still require confirmation."
  },
  "diagnostic_evidence_context_from_APA": {
    "normal_or_equivocal": "Normal or equivocal morphology alone is insufficient evidence for a chronic-pancreatitis diagnosis.",
    "mild": "Mild morphology supports probable chronic pancreatitis only when combined with a suggestive history or abnormal imaging context and abnormal pancreatic physiology in the APA evidence framework.",
    "moderate_or_marked": "Moderate or marked ductal and parenchymal morphology is listed as definitive imaging evidence, while a credible mimicker such as pancreatic cancer must still be excluded.",
    "unresolved_II_III": "The operational mild-or-moderate state does not silently inherit definitive status; resolve the ductal branch or integrate the full clinical and physiologic evidence before labeling certainty."
  },
  "stepwise_clinical_context": {
    "sequence": [
      "survey_history_risk_factors_and_prior_pancreatitis",
      "pancreas_protocol_CT_or_MRI_MRCP",
      "specialist_EUS_when_equivocal",
      "pancreatic_function_testing_when_needed",
      "ERCP_with_therapeutic_intent"
    ],
    "least_invasive_rule": "Proceed from less invasive to more invasive testing and maximize specificity before assigning a chronic irreversible disease label.",
    "physiology_rule": "Report exocrine and endocrine function separately. Cambridge morphology does not determine secretory, exocrine or endocrine stage."
  },
  "differential_and_complication_checks": [
    "Exclude pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma when there is an abrupt or long stricture, upstream atrophy, a mass, vascular involvement, unexplained weight loss or another discordant feature.",
    "Consider main-duct or mixed-type IPMN when duct dilatation, side-branch cysts or mucin cannot be confidently attributed to chronic pancreatitis.",
    "Consider autoimmune, obstructive, hereditary and recurrent-acute-pancreatitis causes rather than treating the morphology grade as an etiology.",
    "Report pseudocyst or other collection, biliary or duodenal obstruction, splenic-vein thrombosis, vascular complication and acute-on-chronic inflammation separately."
  ],
  "management_and_risk_context": {
    "management_rule": "The Cambridge grade does not prescribe analgesia, enzymes, endoscopy, surgery or surveillance. It structures morphology and diagnostic certainty; care depends on pain, obstruction, stones, collections, nutrition, exocrine and endocrine function, etiology and cancer concern.",
    "risk_rule": "Higher grades indicate greater morphologic abnormality but do not provide per-grade probabilities for pain, insufficiency, cancer, hospitalization or intervention.",
    "safety_rule": "Do not infer absence of physiologic impairment from a low grade or quantify complication risk from the ordinal label alone."
  },
  "output_contract": [
    "modality_and_protocol_including_secretin_status_when_relevant",
    "technical_adequacy_and_duct_visualization",
    "abnormal_side_branch_count",
    "main_pancreatic_duct_measurement_and_morphology",
    "cross_sectional_base_features_with_locations",
    "marked_features_and_complications",
    "Cambridge_word_label_and_official_grade_0_to_IV_or_mild_or_moderate_operational_uncertainty",
    "APA_diagnostic_evidence_context",
    "neoplasm_or_other_mimicker_warning",
    "physiology_and_etiology_reported_separately"
  ],
  "missing_input_behavior": [
    "If modality is unknown, do not apply a threshold because the ductal and cross-sectional branches are not interchangeable.",
    "If side branches are not visualized, do not infer a normal, equivocal, mild or moderate ductal grade from their apparent absence.",
    "If CT, MRI or ultrasound shows at least two base features but no adequate ductal branch, return mild-or-moderate rather than forcing II or III.",
    "If a marked feature is suspected but size, duct relationship or alternative diagnosis is unresolved, report suspected advanced morphology and request characterization rather than automatically assigning IV.",
    "If cancer or another obstructive cause remains credible, do not finalize chronic pancreatitis as the sole explanation from the Cambridge score."
  ],
  "interpretation_limits": [
    "The original classification is primarily ductographic; its translation to CT, MRI and ultrasound is an adaptation with limited intermediate-grade separation.",
    "A morphology grade is not an etiology, pain scale, functional stage, cancer-risk calculator or treatment algorithm.",
    "Normal morphology cannot exclude early disease, and advanced morphology cannot by itself exclude a superimposed neoplasm."
  ],
  "source_locator": "Sarner and Cotton, Gut 1984;25:756-759, PMID 6735257, DOI 10.1136/gut.25.7.756, Cambridge consensus and original ductographic framework; Conwell et al., Pancreas 2014;43:1143-1162, PMID 25333398, DOI 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000237, Evidence-Based Report, Tables 5-8 and STEP-wise algorithm; Tirkes et al., Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2018;26:451-467, PMC6214211, Table 3 and imaging limitations."
}

Categorias num relance

Cat.SignificadoCondutaRiscoFonte
normal
Grade 0, normal
Cambridge 0, normal: no abnormal signs on an adequately visualized ERCP/MRCP ductal examination and no chronic-pancreatitis morphology features on the applicable CT, MRI or ultrasound branch.
Report a normal morphology grade only with modality and technical adequacy. Normal morphology does not exclude early chronic pancreatitis; if clinical suspicion remains high, the APA recommends a stepwise clinical, cross-sectional, specialist endoscopic and functional evaluation rather than treatment based on Grade 0.Grade 0 supplies no estimate of future pancreatitis, pain, exocrine or endocrine insufficiency, cancer or intervention. Early chronic pancreatitis can have normal ductal and cross-sectional morphology.
Conwell et al. 2014 APA guideline, Tables 5-6: normal morphology and insufficient-evidence framework; Evidence-Based Report and STEP-wise algorithm. Tirkes et al. 2018, Table 3 Grade 0 and imaging-limitations discussion.
equivocal
Grade I, equivocal
Cambridge I, equivocal: one or two abnormal side branches on adequately visualized ERCP/MRCP, or exactly one APA cross-sectional base feature such as a 2-4 mm main duct, slight enlargement, heterogeneous parenchyma, a cavity under 10 mm, irregular ducts, focal pancreatitis, echogenic duct wall or irregular contour.
Equivocal morphology alone is insufficient evidence for a chronic-pancreatitis diagnosis in the APA framework. Preserve the exact feature and pursue a higher-specificity stepwise evaluation only when the history and clinical suspicion justify it; do not label or treat irreversible disease from Grade I alone.Grade I is diagnostic uncertainty, not a low numeric risk tier. It does not quantify progression, pain, pancreatic insufficiency, malignancy or treatment need, and the isolated feature may have another cause.
Conwell et al. 2014 APA guideline, Table 5 insufficient evidence and Table 6 Grade I: fewer than three abnormal side branches or one CT/MRI/US feature; diagnostic algorithm text. Tirkes et al. 2018, Table 3 Grade I.
mild
Grade II, mild
Cambridge II, mild on the ductal branch: three or more abnormal side branches without the full Grade III pattern of more than three abnormal branches plus an abnormal main pancreatic duct, and without a Grade IV marked feature. On CT/MRI/US alone, use the operational II-versus-III state when the intermediate grade cannot be separated.
In the APA evidence framework, mild morphology contributes to probable chronic pancreatitis when paired with a suggestive history or abnormal imaging context and abnormal pancreatic physiology. It is not a treatment category; characterize etiology and exocrine/endocrine function separately.Grade II denotes mild morphologic burden but provides no per-grade probability of pain, functional failure, cancer, hospitalization or intervention. Symptoms and physiology may be discordant with morphology.
Conwell et al. 2014 APA guideline, Tables 5-6: mild imaging morphology, three or more abnormal side branches, probable-evidence requirements and CT/MRI intermediate-grade limitation. Tirkes et al. 2018, Table 3 Grade II.
moderate
Grade III, moderate
Cambridge III, moderate on the ductal branch: more than three abnormal side branches together with an abnormal main pancreatic duct, without a Grade IV marked feature. The APA table states that CT/MRI morphology cannot reliably distinguish this grade from mild morphology by the base feature set alone.
Moderate ductal and parenchymal morphology is listed as definitive imaging evidence in the APA framework, but the report must still exclude a credible mimicker and describe physiology, etiology and complications. Grade III alone does not prescribe endoscopic, surgical or medical treatment.Grade III indicates more advanced morphology than Grade II but is not a validated complication or cancer-risk percentage. Prognosis and care depend on function, pain, obstruction, stones, collections, nutrition, etiology and patient context.
Conwell et al. 2014 APA guideline, Table 5 definitive moderate/marked imaging evidence and Table 6 Grade III: abnormal main duct with more than three abnormal side branches; CT/MRI cannot distinguish from mild. Tirkes et al. 2018, Table 3 Grade III.
marked
Grade IV, marked (severe)
Cambridge IV, marked or severe: the preceding moderate morphology plus at least one advanced feature, including a cavity over 10 mm, intraductal filling defect or calculus, duct obstruction or stricture, severe or gross duct irregularity/dilatation, or substantial gland enlargement in the cross-sectional adaptation.
Marked morphology is definitive imaging evidence in the APA framework and should trigger complete reporting of obstruction, stones, collections, vascular or biliary complications and cancer concern. It still does not dictate a procedure; management depends on symptoms, function, complications, anatomy and multidisciplinary assessment.Grade IV is the greatest morphologic burden in this framework, but it supplies no individual probability of pain, insufficiency, malignancy, hospitalization or intervention. Advanced chronic change also does not exclude a superimposed pancreatic neoplasm.
Conwell et al. 2014 APA guideline, Tables 5-6 Grade IV: moderate changes plus large cavity, filling defect/calculus, obstruction, stricture, gross irregularity or enlargement; definitive-evidence context. Tirkes et al. 2018, Table 3 Grade IV and complications discussion.
mild-or-moderate
Operational state: Grade II versus III unresolved on CT/MRI/US alone
Operational uncertainty state, not an additional official grade: CT, conventional MRI or ultrasound demonstrates at least two APA base morphology features without a marked feature, but no adequate ductal side-branch and main-duct assessment is available to distinguish Cambridge II from III.
Return the demonstrated feature list and the II-versus-III limitation. If the distinction would change diagnostic certainty or care, integrate history and physiology and consider specialist MRCP, secretin-enhanced MRCP or EUS as appropriate; never convert the ambiguity into a false Grade II or III.Because the official intermediate grade is unresolved, no grade-specific risk inference is valid. Even after resolution, Cambridge morphology does not provide calibrated probabilities for symptoms, pancreatic failure, cancer or intervention.
Conwell et al. 2014 APA guideline, Table 6: CT/MRI Grade II uses at least two base features and the Grade III cell states that moderate cannot be distinguished from mild; Tables 5 and 8 show why morphology grade affects evidence nomenclature. Tirkes et al. 2018, Table 3 parallel modality branches.

Referências cruzadas

fronteira compartilhadaRevised Atlanta. Revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitisCambridge grades chronic pancreatitis ductal severity; the revised Atlanta classification grades acute pancreatitis.

Histórico de versões

DataEventoDetalheSituação
2026-08-12revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2026-08-11revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2026-08-10revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2026-08-09revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2026-08-08revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2026-08-07revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2026-08-06revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2026-08-05revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2026-08-04revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2026-08-03revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2026-08-02revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2026-08-01revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2026-07-31revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2026-07-30revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2026-07-29revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2026-07-28revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2026-07-27revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2026-07-26revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2026-07-25revisedMonitored source changed (content_hash). Detected automatically; awaiting reviewer confirmation. evidênciaaguardando revisão
2014-11-01revisedThe American Pancreatic Association diagnostic guideline adapted Cambridge morphology to CT, MRI, ultrasound and MRCP, and placed the grade inside a stepwise evidence framework. evidênciaconfirmado
1984-07-01publishedThe Cambridge consensus defined the pancreatitis terminology and the ductographic chronic-pancreatitis morphology framework. evidênciaconfirmado
Quickstart da APIGET /api/v1/systems/cambridge-pancreatitisaberto
curl -s "https://radcommons.laudos.ai/api/v1/systems/cambridge-pancreatitis"
Ver documentação completa